Showing posts with label Movies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Movies. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 9, 2008

Not To Be Repetitive ...

But I've got another movie post for you.

Thanks to mom Santa, N got a movie gift card in his stocking this year. For us, this is a really awesome gift (as was the gift card to O'Charley's). See, we don't have a lot of money for extras, and when we want to go out without the kids, money becomes a big problem. To go to a movie, you have to pay the sitter (2 hour movie, 15 minutes of previews, 30 minutes round-trip traveling, 10-15 minutes of getting there early, and 15 minutes of "show sitter the ropes" time = $35, and that's just for a 2 hour movie). You also have to buy tickets (2 adults = $18). So, we're looking at $50-$60 just to spend a bit of time in a theater. I cringe to think we might want to add dinner or even theater popcorn to that.

No wonder we so often choose animated kids' movies ... it's cheaper just to bring them along. (And hey, Enchanted was damn funny.)

But with the magic of a gift card, the expense of the theater is shouldered by that wonderful little piece of plastic. So we went out last Friday night and saw the movie Juno.


*************************
DISCLAIMER: Although I don't think this post will ruin the movie for you -- it's pretty clear what the plot is from the previews -- I will be discussing a few specifics. I'm really not going to reveal much, but you may want to wait to read this until after you've seen the movie. And trust me, you should definitely see the movie.
*************************


Juno is about a 16 year-old girl who gets pregnant after sleeping with her best friend. She decides to have an abortion, but then can't go through with it. Instead of keeping the baby, she opts for giving it up for adoption. This all happens in about the first 15 minutes. The movie is really about following Juno through her pregnancy, and showing what it's like to be not only a pregnant teen but an adoptive parent hopeful as well.

This movie hit home for me in a way that it won't for many people. See, I found myself in the same situation at the same age. Pregnant at 16. It's an enormous, terrifying, overwhelming place to be in. And just like Juno, I was a "good girl" (although, unlike her, my boyfriend was a loser that I would have been much better off without). It shocked just about everyone, I think, who heard about me. It shocked the hell out of me, that's for sure. Looking back, I don't know why I was so surprised; I don't know how I had convinced myself that I wouldn't get pregnant. Hello ... unprotected sex = pregnancy ... duh! (It also equals STDs, and I can say that it is only by the grace of God that pregnant was all I got.)

Juno experiences that same feeling, that shock of, "Oh my God, it's not real, it's not real, that's not a plus sign, it's not real, oh my God, no no no nononononoooooooooooooooooo!" But she gets past it pretty quickly and decides on abortion with relative ease. When that option becomes unacceptable to her, she grabs onto adoption and holds it with both hands, no looking back.

I was very much the same. I considered abortion, but never very seriously. I don't know why, honestly, because obviously I didn't have extremely high morals at that point. But I just couldn't do it. Oddly enough -- or maybe not so much -- keeping the baby was also never a serious consideration. It just wasn't going to happen. That pretty much left me with adoption.

Just like Juno, once I settled on adoption, there was no going back. From the moment I chose my child's adoptive family (and my first choice was *it*), the baby was no longer mine. I was just growing it for this lovely couple that couldn't grow their own child. I gave birth a month after I turned 17, and I never once regretted that I didn't leave the hospital with a baby girl in my arms. She wasn't mine. I could never give her what she needed. She already had parents, two wonderful people, and my place was only to say goodbye and walk away.

You have no idea how many people thought I was being cruel to "give away" my child. *I* had no idea that my choice was going to be regarded with such scorn. Honestly, the mindset of most of the people in my life was that keeping the baby, finishing high school through a continuation program, going on welfare, and letting my parents raise my child was perfectly acceptable. Or Jesus, go get a quick abortion, because even that would be better than "abandoning" my baby at birth. I was stunned at the number of people who honestly believed I was making the wrong choice, not only a bad one, but a horrible, heartless one.

I can say now, with complete certitude, those people are ignorant jackasses.

I do, however, have to allow them a bit of slack. You see, society, for all it's advances, is still in the dark ages in regards to adoption. I don't know why, but considering the fact that adoptions themselves have changed quite a bit, it's amazing to me that society still regards adoption as the least-favorable, most difficult, often worst choice for a young pregnant woman and her child.

I don't understand.

I don't understand why it is considered easier to get an abortion, when it has been proven that so many women who have abortions often have psychological fall-out for years afterward.

I don't understand why it is less of a stigma to rid yourself of an unwanted child than it is to carry that child to term.

I don't understand why anyone would feel it is better to stop a life before it starts than let a child be raised by someone other than the biological parents.

I don't understand why anyone believes giving a child to an adoptive family is wrong and cruel; that life with biological parents is always the best option, even when that life includes things like welfare and food stamps, never feeling equal to your peers because your are so poor, watching your mom work two or three jobs to pay the bills because she dropped out of school after she had you, and knowing your dad took off before you were born because being a teenage father wasn't part of his life's plans.

I don't understand.

For those of you thinking I must be exaggerating, that everyone knows giving a child up for adoption is selfless and wonderful, think again. I had every one of these things and more said directly to my face.

Then, of course, there are the women who think they really are doing the right thing by encouraging (or pushing, or demanding) the pregnant girl to get an abortion. They say, "Well, *I* couldn't go through with adoption, that would be too hard, so this teenage girl certainly shouldn't have to shoulder that burden," when in reality, they have no idea what choice would be the most burdensome to the girl. Encouraging an abortion just because *you* think it's easiest is beyond absurd. Who are you to decide what is going to weigh on her conscience 1, 10, 20, 50 years from now? Who are you to decide what's *easiest* for someone else?

And please, do NOT spew that rhetoric at me about adoptive children missing a piece of themselves, or feeling abandoned, or wishing they'd never been born. Ever heard of open adoption? Look it up. Open adoption wipes out the issues caused by old-school adoption, when the child could, and often did, have unanswered questions about his/her bio parents. Plus, for the birth parents, open adoption offers so much flexibility. You choose from "I'll tell you everything you need to know, contact me if an issue comes up, but I don't want updates on the child" to pictures and letters to actual visitation (which is what I have). The pregnant mom gets to decide what her comfort level is, then she chooses a couple who agree and are comfortable with the same.

Do all teenage pregnancies end in a life cycle of poverty and parent-absenteeism? No, of course not. But statistically, that is a very common result - actually, the most common result. Do all adoptions, especially in regards to open adoption terms, work out as wonderfully as mine did? Again, no, of course not. Adoption isn't a guarantee of a perfect life. It's a chance. Sometimes it's the *only* chance a child gets.

Is it easy? Hell, no. Giving a child up is never easy. But it doesn't have to be as difficult as it once was. If more people would research and actually *learn* about adoption, I believe it would become more acceptable to society as a whole. In today's world, adoption falls into a wicked catch-22. It's not a common choice, so people don't know much about it. People don't know much about it, so they don't consider it as an option. People don't consider it as an option, so it's not a common choice.

See the cycle?

More people than I care to count told me that, "Once your baby is born and you hold it, you will change your mind. After all, that baby is your own flesh and blood." Um, no. I chose my child's family when I was four months along, and I never wavered. I never even thought "what if". Because, you see, I love her. I love her with all my heart. I love her so much, I couldn't keep her. I couldn't do that to her.

And you know what? I made the right decision. My baby girl has the perfect family who loves her more than anything, and a life that is so much better than whatever I could have cobbled together for her. Do I miss her? Of course. She *is* my flesh and blood, and there will always be ties between us.

Sure, I've wondered over the years what it would have been like if I had decided differently, or changed my mind as so many thought I would. It's been hard at times, knowing that my firstborn was growing up somewhere else, somewhere that I wasn't. But my daughter has a mom, and it's not me, and she is more lucky for that than she knows. She also has her dad, her sister, her grandparents. Her aunts, uncles, and cousins. She has her parent's friends, the ones who are so close they are just like family. And she also has me. She has my husband, who loves her deeply. She has my children, who adore their big sister. She has my parents, my brother, my best friends. She has the biggest family of any child I know. She is surrounded by love.

That's the beauty, and perfection, of adoption.

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

Seen Any Good Movies Lately?

First of all, for all you people who are bitching at me to blog: Step. Off. ! I told you in my very first post that if I was actually being a good mom, I wouldn't have time for this crap. And between two birthdays (yes, I birthed both my children in the month of December; please send your pity and money to VA) and the upcoming holiday (for which I have not bought a single present), I've been slowly going crazy busy. I promise to post something substantial soon(er or later).

(Honestly, I love you all and I am gratified that you want me to blog. Please have patience and just send me a kick in the ass every once in awhile.)

Despite my busyness, I have been reading my emails. Not responding, mind you -- that would take too much time -- but reading. And the other day I received a forward from a relative of mine regarding a certain movie. Now this relative is older, and tends to forward anything and everything that lands in her inbox. I usually just roll my eyes and delete them. Occasionally when they are just too outrageous, I will track the rumor down on Snopes and send her a link. But for the most part, I just ignore.

However, this email was one of several that I've received about this movie, and I just couldn't take it any more. Upon reading it, my eyes glazed over and my brain went into melt-down mode. My fingers hit 'respond' and started typing without any prompting from the ol' grey matter. And apparently my "don't-chew-out-older-relatives-because-you-will-just-offend-them-and-get-the-family-up-in-arms" button was on vacation, because I went off on a rant worthy of Dennis Miller.

This is the email that I received originally:

THE GOLDEN COMPASS, IS A SOON TO BE RELEASED MOVIE WITH NICOLE KIDMAN.........AS CHRISTIANS WE NEED TO GET THE WORD OUT ABOUT THIS MOVIE, IT IS COMING OUT IN DECEMBER, AN ATHEIST PRODUCED IT, IT IS MARKETED FOR CHILDREN AND IN THE END THEY KILL GOD!
CHECK IT OUT WITH THE 'SNOPES' WEB-SITE BELOW. http://snopes.com/politics/religion/compass.asp

I did manage to preface my response with the following:

No offense or anger or any negativity toward those who have forwarded this email is intended. I am simply stating *my own* feelings on this message that has been busily making the rounds.

And then I kinda lost it ...

Actually, no one kills God in this movie. The movie doesn't really have anything to do with religion. The books do, but the movie is a watered-down version of only the first book, and the studio took the religious tones out. If you actually read that Snopes article, it quotes the president of the Catholic league in saying that the movie is not the problem.

Honestly, it's a PG-13 movie, so I wouldn't take my kids to see it anyway. But my feeling is if my faith is strong, and I'm raising my kids to have that same faith, then a movie--which is *fantasy* and about *entertainment*--is not going to harm them, even if the book it was based on has anti-religious themes. I'm much more worried about the exposure they will get to sex and violence through movies then about them seeing one that brings up religion.

The outrage over this movie is somewhat bemusing to me, seeing as how the movie doesn't include the religious themes of the books. So many people are passing this email around without doing any of their own research on what they are protesting. The Snopes article isn't the only one written on this, but it's the one everyone is linking to. However, even in the Snopes article, it is directly stated that, "In 'His Dark Materials,' Pullman's criticisms of organized religion come across as anti-authoritarian and anti-ascetic rather than anti-doctrinal. (Jesus isn't mentioned in any of the books, although Pullman has hinted that He might figure in a forthcoming sequel, "The Book of Dust.") His fundamental objection is to ideological tyranny and the rejection of this world in favor of an idealized afterlife, regardless of creed."

(By the way, if you want to read a thorough and non-biased article on the movie, go to http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200712/religious-movies).

One thing that every Christian passing around warnings about this movie seems to miss is that the movie is not anti-Christian. It's anti-religion. Pullman doesn't like religion, and he wrote a trilogy of books about it. Part of the trilogy was made into a movie, and now the Christians have their panties in a wad. Why??? Why not Jewish people? Where are the Hindu protesters? Muslims? Anyone? No, it's just the Christians. I wonder why that is. Are Christians less secure in their faith than people of different religious persuasion? Do Christians more strongly feel the need to de-cry anything that challenges religion in general?

Not this Christian. My faith is strong enough to be perfectly fine with the existence of a movie based on a book written by someone who is anti-religion. I've questioned the practices of my church enough to not have a leg to stand on when it comes to others who question as well. And you know what? Someone else's doubts might start an interesting theological discussion for me, but they are not going to change my core beliefs. I'm fine with an atheist making a movie about their beliefs. I'm fine with an agnostic person making a movie about their beliefs. I'm fine with a Jewish or Muslim or Hindu or WHATEVER person making a movie about their beliefs, or lack of. I am sad and disgusted that us Christians can't seem to be tolerant toward beliefs that aren't our own. Even beliefs that go *directly against* our own are still valid beliefs, for the person believing them.

My heartfelt wish is that this email would shrivel up and die. It's misleading and in some cases an outright lie. I would love to see the Christians of the world get up, get off their computers, and go volunteer in a soup kitchen or collect toys for homeless children. I'd love to see us *really* make a Christian difference, instead of worrying about a silly fantasy movie.

*****
Looking back, I realize that although I still truly believe in everything I wrote, I most likely really hurt the relative who sent me the original email. I'm sorry for that, I really am. I should have just vented to my husband, like I usually do (he puts up with a lot of venting). But since I did send it, and I can't take it back, I can only hope that some free thought starts taking the place of knee-jerk, sheep-like reactionism.

Or at the very least, that I won't be getting more forwards any time soon.

Happy Holidays y'all.

Signed,
The Spreader of Truth and Light; aka, The Killer of Bad Forwards